there is one more way to save the children. risky but might work. remember how that leila switched hostages from her brother to father? there was no apparent reason to Not devour the brother, unless either the brother is still has some use to her or she has some limitations on how or when she can devour something. She can use the same method to save children.
But rationally speaking, It is not worth risking more to save the children. nomatter how cruel it maybe because consider this – if children are in leila control, there is good chance that they are already devoured by her. plus even if they are alive she will use the children as a wager against any move Protagnist makes. Risking the entire world for few children who are possibly already dead, seems rather stupid decision to me. peace🫰
Arsène
there is one more way to save the children. risky but might work. remember how that leila switched hostages from her brother to father? there was no apparent reason to Not devour the brother, unless either the brother is still has some use to her or she has some limitations on how or when she can devour something. She can use the same method to save children.
But rationally speaking, It is not worth risking more to save the children. nomatter how cruel it maybe because consider this – if children are in leila control, there is good chance that they are already devoured by her. plus even if they are alive she will use the children as a wager against any move Protagnist makes. Risking the entire world for few children who are possibly already dead, seems rather stupid decision to me. peace🫰
Sparkling
(-̩̩̩-̩̩̩-̩̩̩-̩̩̩-̩̩̩___-̩̩̩-̩̩̩-̩̩̩-̩̩̩-̩̩̩)